|
|
Post by Zyroloth on Feb 16, 2009 14:58:08 GMT 1
Just to remind you and make some things clear:
Coming weekend, probably sunday at night or so
TDM 3v3
2 maps of each clan's choice
no fraglimit
20 mins timelimit
1 map on dracs 1 on Trouble's (aslong as this lag will be fixed)
|
|
|
|
Post by shexpeare on Feb 16, 2009 16:06:23 GMT 1
Sounds like a date.  I don't like the time limit though. So I hope you are flexible on that point and accept 100 or 150 frag limit instead. The VnB's that are gonna play will have to give their opinion on the server suggestion. All the same to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Zyroloth on Feb 16, 2009 16:38:24 GMT 1
Okay, we still got time to make up an idea about the servers we're going to play on. The thing about the fraglimit is okay, I'd go for 150 then! |
|
|
|
Post by PM* on Feb 16, 2009 17:52:38 GMT 1
I´d suggest Shexpeare server instead of Troubles, i am also okei with Draculas server, because we live in the same country. And what about 200 fraglimit? And why we have to play that war on weekend, weekends are pretty much for partying and drinking, a date in week would be much better idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zyroloth on Feb 16, 2009 18:11:18 GMT 1
Well, I got lags on shex' server =/
|
|
|
|
Post by Zyroloth on Feb 16, 2009 20:27:58 GMT 1
Well, 200 frags is cool, too, I guess! Bout the date, well, we can also during the week, which might be better since I happen to leave home at the weekend, so what about the days after the weekend? I got vacation there so it's cool for ME. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by dracula on Feb 16, 2009 20:39:55 GMT 1
200 frag is good and when we will play?
|
|
|
|
Post by Trouble* on Feb 17, 2009 1:46:06 GMT 1
200 frag are you crazy? do you know how long the war took with 3on3 with 150 fraglimit?
4on4=200
3on3=150
2on2=100
and btw, didnt we choose 4on4 for this war? can be me but...
|
|
|
|
Post by Zyroloth on Feb 17, 2009 8:55:42 GMT 1
I told shex to prepare 3-4 ppl since we were not sure about the player number.^ Anyway, so what about the date, sux I am not at home on le weekend.  |
|
|
|
Post by =[VnB]=BM* on Feb 17, 2009 13:26:54 GMT 1
ppl told me the same, 4on4..
anyways, i don't know. it supposed to be played last sunday.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zyroloth on Feb 17, 2009 13:37:22 GMT 1
ppl told me the same, 4on4.. anyways, i don't know. it supposed to be played last sunday. I never agreed to last Sunday, that was just some bs made up by drac or whoever. I decide the clan's decisions not any other member ( besides DD maybe), the 4v4 was a rumour, too, I personally spoke with shex some days ago and told him it's gonna be 3v3 OR 4v4, and that I'll tell him the exact style during the following days so could prepare 4 vnb players IF it turned out to be a 4v4. |
|
DD
Full Member
Posts: 125
|
Post by DD on Feb 17, 2009 17:52:03 GMT 1
I personally dislike any fraglimits in wars due to more tactical benefit and the diversity of stress during the gameplay when there is timelimit.
But if a timelimit is of no question at all for you vnb'ers I guess I'll have to stand down in the question, and since BS has done quite some talking here the fraglimit seems to already be agreed.
Nevertheless, I'll discuss it with my friend and we will decide on how we are going to approach this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zyroloth on Feb 17, 2009 17:55:04 GMT 1
I thought I was the only one who prefered timelimit, but as I see DD also does, well we could play 1 map 20 mins timelimit and 1 map 150 fraglimit, to make it fair for both sides.^
|
|
|
|
Post by PM* on Feb 18, 2009 9:04:00 GMT 1
The fraglimit would make the game much more interesting because people wont hide the last minuts and it´s not that much hide-n-seek at all. I prefer hack-n-slash game instead of hide-n-seek.
|
|
|
|
Post by mash on Feb 18, 2009 9:53:46 GMT 1
u will never know where those hammers came from:
|
|
