|
Post by mash on Jul 10, 2010 18:59:33 GMT 1
Dude, we can only block cheats we know about. I've done my best to block all the cheats I know. So unless there is a cheat that I don't know of (in that case please tell me) then no people can't cheat. ye i know^^ its not ur fault::i just think whats the point of anti cheat if poeple still cheat^^
|
|
|
Post by Karigard on Jul 10, 2010 22:19:51 GMT 1
ye i know^^ its not ur fault::i just think whats the point of anti cheat if poeple still cheat^^ I just told you that they can't cheat. Whats the point of thinking about the point of an anticheat, which people could cheat with, when the only existing thing is an anticheat which people cannot cheat with?
|
|
|
Post by mash on Jul 10, 2010 22:23:45 GMT 1
ye i know^^ its not ur fault::i just think whats the point of anti cheat if poeple still cheat^^ I just told you that they can't cheat. Whats the point of thinking about the point of an anticheat, which people could cheat with, when the only existing thing is an anticheat which people cannot cheat with? ok many say now that my friend gnome cheats ok? i dont belive he does. i never did. now we should test if it works on him then? if he doesnt get caught now that would mean hes clean?
|
|
|
Post by shexpeare on Jul 10, 2010 23:42:40 GMT 1
ye i know^^ its not ur fault::i just think whats the point of anti cheat if poeple still cheat^^ I just told you that they can't cheat. Whats the point of thinking about the point of an anticheat, which people could cheat with, when the only existing thing is an anticheat which people cannot cheat with? I had to read that a few times before I got it. Well, I actualy still dont get it. But Ill trust your judgement and Im willing to agree. The point of a new anticheat is simply to block more cheats than earlier. No anticheat will ever be 100% safe. But thats not a reason why we shouldnt try to block as many as possible.
|
|
|
Post by mash on Jul 11, 2010 7:48:21 GMT 1
I just told you that they can't cheat. Whats the point of thinking about the point of an anticheat, which people could cheat with, when the only existing thing is an anticheat which people cannot cheat with? I had to read that a few times before I got it. Well, I actualy still dont get it. But Ill trust your judgement and Im willing to agree. The point of a new anticheat is simply to block more cheats than earlier. No anticheat will ever be 100% safe. But thats not a reason why we shouldnt try to block as many as possible. i wonder if we ever gonna find an anticheat that really blocks anything there is. for full
|
|
|
Post by shexpeare on Jul 11, 2010 9:02:26 GMT 1
I dont think I even imagined there will be a 100% secure server protection. There will always be new ways to get around the blocks, Im afraid.
Im more than satisfied as long as we have coders that are willing to offer time and energy to make new mutators. Without those coders the situation would be a lot worse.
|
|
|
Post by mash on Jul 11, 2010 19:25:50 GMT 1
I dont think I even imagined there will be a 100% secure server protection. There will always be new ways to get around the blocks, Im afraid. Im more than satisfied as long as we have coders that are willing to offer time and energy to make new mutators. Without those coders the situation would be a lot worse. i think that this game is so buggy that its impossible to stop cheaters. reall cheaters will allways be one step ahead.
|
|
|
Post by Karigard on Jul 11, 2010 22:09:32 GMT 1
Impossible is nothing.
But you're right about one thing. Rune is a very buggy game.
|
|
|
Post by mash on Jul 12, 2010 11:32:36 GMT 1
Impossible is nothing. But you're right about one thing. Rune is a very buggy game. if its not impossible than we would already have it. but as u see the years go by and nothing new.
|
|
|
Post by Karigard on Jul 12, 2010 12:50:55 GMT 1
Sorry, but I disagree. That fact that nobody done it yet doesn't mean that it's impossible.
|
|
|
Post by mash on Jul 12, 2010 18:06:02 GMT 1
Sorry, but I disagree. That fact that nobody done it yet doesn't mean that it's impossible. im talkin about that poeple still call each other cheaters..many many years have gone since rune got released. and noone has released an anticheat mutator that beats everything:)
|
|
|
Post by =[VnB]=BM* on Jul 12, 2010 18:52:08 GMT 1
I think it's nearly impossible.
|
|
|
Post by ¦ËÑÇLÂV˦Çhrøñîç* on Jul 13, 2010 13:51:02 GMT 1
This wasn't so safe after all.. :\
|
|
|
Post by Trouble* on Jul 15, 2010 15:57:43 GMT 1
at least the anticheats get better and better.
|
|
|
Post by ¦ËÑÇLÂV˦Çhrøñîç* on Jul 15, 2010 20:54:49 GMT 1
Won't be 100% safe but at least it blocks about 90% of the cheaters.. it's pretty useless against the botters though..It did however block the anonymous spams and other messages related to players but the real wallhacks, speedhacks, fakelags etc all work atm.. + some set commands executed through the bot work too it seems. I personally had my server running this mutator get tested for weaknesses some days ago just to see how safe it really was.
But I'm glad there is something available to block those 90% anyway, although it's a bit bugged or over-strict at certain points. Some noobs doesn't know what is considered cheating so at some commands a message to player alone would be enough + blocking them from executing the command they aren't allowed to execute of course.
|
|